Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work."
Thomas Alva Edison
I start with a quote today because I have been involved in planning the next Bath EJU debate this year. In my opinion lots of good topics we dismissed because the research looked like it would be hard work.
Well we have a debate title and hopefully we will stream it live on the net on 6th August 2009.
I would like your help if you have an opinion on the following....
Do you feel that the IJF have had rule changes to try and get TV coverage? If so what example would you give?
Also do you believe influence TV has had has been positive or negative. If you can give example let me know.
The reason being we are going to be debating this and I want to try and see if there are common opinions from the rank and file Judoka.
I was also wondering what rule change do you think would help get TV coverage?
When exploring the idea I generally thought about TV and its effect on sport. For instance football kick off times being altered to suit TV companies, the swimming at the Olympics taking place in the morning so it can go live in the major TV markets...or the Athens Olympic Marathon taking place in the peak of the day...for TV.
I agree TV brings in money to a sport through sponsorship and broadcast rites. It raises the sports profile and therefore encourages participation. But is it something that a sport like Judo should chase? Could we compete with boxing and MMA as a TV spectacular?
I don’t have answers yet just questions....your thoughts please.
Showing posts with label judo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label judo. Show all posts
Friday, 3 April 2009
Tuesday, 24 February 2009
Perceived Danger!!
On a flight to Switzerland I overheard a couple of people comment on a newspaper report about Chris Hoy, Olympic Gold Medallist, and a cycling accident at the Track Word Championships in The Netherlands. (Article from International Herald and Tribune
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2009/02/14/sports/CYC-Track-Cycling-World-Cup.php )
The conversation was about was it news – a dad was saying kids fall off bikes all the time, he was dismissive of it. Mum was saying she didn’t think cycling was dangerous but at the speeds they go they don’t have much protection.
This brought about a thought and a recollection of a conversation I have had whilst doing circus skills workshops and magic workshops. Jugglers train to be technically perfect, never dropping a ball, just like a tight rope walker, they don’t want to fall off or wobble. Yet in order to entertain there has to be a perception of danger for the audience, a wobble and almost stumble on the tight rope or the aborted 1st attempt at a big move, a dropped ball or club them a successful attempt.
Cycling can be dangerous but it isn’t perceived as such. Judo can be potentially dangerous but when it is televised it is becoming sanitised. Boxing, Karate have blows to the head, cage fighting with its brutality all get good TV coverage, all have strong danger elements.
When the IJF remove a throw because someone breaks a leg, saying a throw is now to dangerous ( these where world class players), this reduced potential risk, but the reverse is true people want to watch the risk. This is what TV producers might call the car crash effect. When Joe Theisman's leg broke this was a highlight on TV news now it’s on the internet...here is the link .....
http://www.extremesportclips.com/video/299/Joe-Theisman-Leg-Break.html
Did you watch it ......if so why ...... You Tube is full of these.
The IJF want to make Judo a TV sport, a sport TV companies want to cover, we have huge throws, this is great but there is NO DANGER....we minimise risk. Look on You Tube for clips of O Soto Gari knocking someone out, strangles where the player is knocked out.
These elements make TV viewing – they are the danger in Judo. Give a TV company danger and watch viewers flood in. If you have to put in one martial arts event in your schedule for your TV company , you are looking for spectacular, danger and excitement would you be choosing judo over boxing, MAA or kick boxing or Thai boxing ? NO. Why the gap between fights and lack of action ...perhaps but no danger!!!
So we are cleaning up Judo for TV .......or are we removing the elements, the characters ( don’t get me started on mat side coaches) the danger or at least perceived danger. Some of it is just marketing...in MAA they CHOKE A PLAYER OUT ( sounds bad) in Judo we get him to submit ( much weaker how – talk him to death?)
Which sound more dangerous and which one would you watch?
Just an opinion and thought for the day.
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2009/02/14/sports/CYC-Track-Cycling-World-Cup.php )
The conversation was about was it news – a dad was saying kids fall off bikes all the time, he was dismissive of it. Mum was saying she didn’t think cycling was dangerous but at the speeds they go they don’t have much protection.
This brought about a thought and a recollection of a conversation I have had whilst doing circus skills workshops and magic workshops. Jugglers train to be technically perfect, never dropping a ball, just like a tight rope walker, they don’t want to fall off or wobble. Yet in order to entertain there has to be a perception of danger for the audience, a wobble and almost stumble on the tight rope or the aborted 1st attempt at a big move, a dropped ball or club them a successful attempt.
Cycling can be dangerous but it isn’t perceived as such. Judo can be potentially dangerous but when it is televised it is becoming sanitised. Boxing, Karate have blows to the head, cage fighting with its brutality all get good TV coverage, all have strong danger elements.
When the IJF remove a throw because someone breaks a leg, saying a throw is now to dangerous ( these where world class players), this reduced potential risk, but the reverse is true people want to watch the risk. This is what TV producers might call the car crash effect. When Joe Theisman's leg broke this was a highlight on TV news now it’s on the internet...here is the link .....
http://www.extremesportclips.com/video/299/Joe-Theisman-Leg-Break.html
Did you watch it ......if so why ...... You Tube is full of these.
The IJF want to make Judo a TV sport, a sport TV companies want to cover, we have huge throws, this is great but there is NO DANGER....we minimise risk. Look on You Tube for clips of O Soto Gari knocking someone out, strangles where the player is knocked out.
These elements make TV viewing – they are the danger in Judo. Give a TV company danger and watch viewers flood in. If you have to put in one martial arts event in your schedule for your TV company , you are looking for spectacular, danger and excitement would you be choosing judo over boxing, MAA or kick boxing or Thai boxing ? NO. Why the gap between fights and lack of action ...perhaps but no danger!!!
So we are cleaning up Judo for TV .......or are we removing the elements, the characters ( don’t get me started on mat side coaches) the danger or at least perceived danger. Some of it is just marketing...in MAA they CHOKE A PLAYER OUT ( sounds bad) in Judo we get him to submit ( much weaker how – talk him to death?)
Which sound more dangerous and which one would you watch?
Just an opinion and thought for the day.
Friday, 6 February 2009
Games or Drills Pt 2
Let me start this post with an apology – as I was working late yesterdays post was posted just after midnight so you get two posts today.
However following an email exchange with Lance Wicks ( www.planetjudo.com) I have decided to do two or three Blogs a week and then do smaller intermittent posts in between. I hope to post every Sunday, Tuesday and Friday.
Following on from yesterdays post about games, at present the most popular title on Judo Games is 1001 Judo games – Fighting Films has a DVD of the same name which I have bought and will review next week. A quick note on my reviews, everything I review I will have bought and paid for so I will review it as I see it. This title always frustrates me, it should read - 20 or so game ideas with lots of variations !
Taking yesterdays point that games can become or include drills but they are games first and for most. I want to look at a GAME and develop it for use in Judo. Some of these ideas are original, some are developments of things I have seen and others are as seen but then I have added a proper Judo frame work for a coach to understand them.
Before we start ask yourself the following questions?
Why am I playing a game?
What is it doing to my class dynamic?
Is it suitable or appropriate to this class, by age, skill and available space?
To many coaches throw games in without considering the above, they should be as planned as technical progressions.
The game I want to look at today is Tig or Tag as it is sometimes called. In its basic form on person is IT or ON they have to touch or tig/tag another player who is then on. The other players have to avoid being tagged, they can run around within a defined area.
The fun comes in the participant introducing risk – how close can they get without being tagged. The older the players the more risk they can take. The game helps to develop fundamental skills of speed, agility and reactions.
GAMES in general also allow the participant to develop tactics and strategies to win and to play within the rules but not always as the organiser intended.
With Tic/Tag if you wish you can then level the playing field if one player excels by adding extra conditions. This could be players moving one their knees or restricting where you can tag an opponent.
A variation is where the intention is to catch every body, so when tagged a play leave the play area or is eliminated. Here players are strategic and not so risk taking.
So we have two variations on one game. How could we introduce key skills?
Ideas could include
· When avoiding being tagged perhaps they do a forward roll or break fall.
· To avoid being tagged perform an sports specific action
· When they are tagged they stand still and they have to be freed by another play.
This last variation is often called Stick in the Mud or Stuck in the Mud, the caught player stands with the legs open and to be freed a player crawls through the legs – how this is done is up to the coach – on the belly or on all fours.
The game in essence doesn’t change you are just adding conditions and rules – often these are safety specific – for instance you always crawl from front to back – to avoid to people clashing head if the both try at the same time form opposite directions. Or for ukemi – stop look roll – some rules however can remove some of the key initial benefits of the cam e.g. speed but it is replaced with a practice of Ukemi.
If I said you had to free them by doing 5 uchi komi of Ippon Seo-nage I have added a small drill or training exercise but WITHIN the game. If I have to change the game too much to allow that to happen, eg. You can’t tag someone during uchi komi, I can have an adverse effect as I could end up with the catcher having no one to chase as they do the drill then losing the fun element and it stops being an effective game.
The problem is coaches look at the game not the reason for doing the game, if I give more uchi komi to higher grades free someone eg. A white belts does 1 uchi komi to free anyone, but brown belts have to do 10. I am balancing out skill levels and making it easier to catch the higher grades, this helps me give the lower grades a feeling of importance and now I have introduced a skill into the game it allow people of different levels to compete collectively on an even keel. This also helps aid group dynamics and retention in participation based classes.
So to recap yesterdays point all the variations of Tic/Tag work as JUDO games in a club because they meet the criteria I have set out.....
1. A game has an objective
2. Has a time scale or restrictive conditions
3. A Challenge or task
4. Defined rules
5. IS FUN
6. If repeated immediately may have a different outcome
7. Age appropriate
So when you look at a book saying 101 games see how many variations you can find of core games. In a way games are like judo throws there are 100’s of variations but the basic throw is the same just developed and applied to different situations.
This is a subject I will come back to.
Have a great day
Marc
However following an email exchange with Lance Wicks ( www.planetjudo.com) I have decided to do two or three Blogs a week and then do smaller intermittent posts in between. I hope to post every Sunday, Tuesday and Friday.
Following on from yesterdays post about games, at present the most popular title on Judo Games is 1001 Judo games – Fighting Films has a DVD of the same name which I have bought and will review next week. A quick note on my reviews, everything I review I will have bought and paid for so I will review it as I see it. This title always frustrates me, it should read - 20 or so game ideas with lots of variations !
Taking yesterdays point that games can become or include drills but they are games first and for most. I want to look at a GAME and develop it for use in Judo. Some of these ideas are original, some are developments of things I have seen and others are as seen but then I have added a proper Judo frame work for a coach to understand them.
Before we start ask yourself the following questions?
Why am I playing a game?
What is it doing to my class dynamic?
Is it suitable or appropriate to this class, by age, skill and available space?
To many coaches throw games in without considering the above, they should be as planned as technical progressions.
The game I want to look at today is Tig or Tag as it is sometimes called. In its basic form on person is IT or ON they have to touch or tig/tag another player who is then on. The other players have to avoid being tagged, they can run around within a defined area.
The fun comes in the participant introducing risk – how close can they get without being tagged. The older the players the more risk they can take. The game helps to develop fundamental skills of speed, agility and reactions.
GAMES in general also allow the participant to develop tactics and strategies to win and to play within the rules but not always as the organiser intended.
With Tic/Tag if you wish you can then level the playing field if one player excels by adding extra conditions. This could be players moving one their knees or restricting where you can tag an opponent.
A variation is where the intention is to catch every body, so when tagged a play leave the play area or is eliminated. Here players are strategic and not so risk taking.
So we have two variations on one game. How could we introduce key skills?
Ideas could include
· When avoiding being tagged perhaps they do a forward roll or break fall.
· To avoid being tagged perform an sports specific action
· When they are tagged they stand still and they have to be freed by another play.
This last variation is often called Stick in the Mud or Stuck in the Mud, the caught player stands with the legs open and to be freed a player crawls through the legs – how this is done is up to the coach – on the belly or on all fours.
The game in essence doesn’t change you are just adding conditions and rules – often these are safety specific – for instance you always crawl from front to back – to avoid to people clashing head if the both try at the same time form opposite directions. Or for ukemi – stop look roll – some rules however can remove some of the key initial benefits of the cam e.g. speed but it is replaced with a practice of Ukemi.
If I said you had to free them by doing 5 uchi komi of Ippon Seo-nage I have added a small drill or training exercise but WITHIN the game. If I have to change the game too much to allow that to happen, eg. You can’t tag someone during uchi komi, I can have an adverse effect as I could end up with the catcher having no one to chase as they do the drill then losing the fun element and it stops being an effective game.
The problem is coaches look at the game not the reason for doing the game, if I give more uchi komi to higher grades free someone eg. A white belts does 1 uchi komi to free anyone, but brown belts have to do 10. I am balancing out skill levels and making it easier to catch the higher grades, this helps me give the lower grades a feeling of importance and now I have introduced a skill into the game it allow people of different levels to compete collectively on an even keel. This also helps aid group dynamics and retention in participation based classes.
So to recap yesterdays point all the variations of Tic/Tag work as JUDO games in a club because they meet the criteria I have set out.....
1. A game has an objective
2. Has a time scale or restrictive conditions
3. A Challenge or task
4. Defined rules
5. IS FUN
6. If repeated immediately may have a different outcome
7. Age appropriate
So when you look at a book saying 101 games see how many variations you can find of core games. In a way games are like judo throws there are 100’s of variations but the basic throw is the same just developed and applied to different situations.
This is a subject I will come back to.
Have a great day
Marc
Game or Drill pt 1
It’s been a hectic day with a trip to London for a judo match with one of the schools I teach at. It was a good match with lots of well fought fights.
Then evening training which was an experience, as my ribs are still painful I ended up doing a light warm up and a bit of shadow Uchi-komi. However it gave me the chance to watch a couple of the boys I train. Not having to worry about teaching allowed me to focus solely on them and their Judo which has left me with lots of ideas to follow up.
Strange that as I was not teaching or trying to train I had a different mindset which meant I was more constructive as a coach – though I had more time I probably said less by focusing on only one or two key points all night.
I received a set of books today for my college course – mainly focusing on speed, agility and quickness drills, strength and explosive power drills and exercises. I will do a critical review of these once I have read them , but in skim reading I saw a number of these drills that have been passed of as Judo games in books and DVD’s.
So today’s question for comment and discussion is when is a game, a game and when is it a drill a game?
Now before I start let me give you some of my background. For over 20 years I earned my living as a professional children’s entertainer and magician. I training people to run birthday parties at McDonald’s throughout the UK. I devised party programmes, games and activities for companies for use in TV Shows, Stage shows and private parties. I have designed and run schools workshops on everything from Hamlet to Circus Skills
I also specialise in Teaching Judo to under 18’s both as a participation coach and a performance style coach. .....so I understand the Modern Child.
I have been to a number of workshops saying they are about Judo Games, there are a number of DVD’s on Judo Games but they are essentially drills and exercises to teach specific skills. Now these are needed and when used well, appropriate - BUT THEY ARE NOT GAMES!
Several DVD’s show adults in workshops loving an exercise but these are workshop games they are not effective regularly – nor are they the sort of things kids request.
Bulldog, Murder Ball, Tag/Tic they are games, things that a child may request to play. So what is a game and how can they be used by a coach?
I use a simple approach to defining a game. They have three conditions
1. A Goal
2. Rules
3. Challenge or task – be this mental physical etc.
Lieberman 2007 defined it as it up as follows:
Then evening training which was an experience, as my ribs are still painful I ended up doing a light warm up and a bit of shadow Uchi-komi. However it gave me the chance to watch a couple of the boys I train. Not having to worry about teaching allowed me to focus solely on them and their Judo which has left me with lots of ideas to follow up.
Strange that as I was not teaching or trying to train I had a different mindset which meant I was more constructive as a coach – though I had more time I probably said less by focusing on only one or two key points all night.
I received a set of books today for my college course – mainly focusing on speed, agility and quickness drills, strength and explosive power drills and exercises. I will do a critical review of these once I have read them , but in skim reading I saw a number of these drills that have been passed of as Judo games in books and DVD’s.
So today’s question for comment and discussion is when is a game, a game and when is it a drill a game?
Now before I start let me give you some of my background. For over 20 years I earned my living as a professional children’s entertainer and magician. I training people to run birthday parties at McDonald’s throughout the UK. I devised party programmes, games and activities for companies for use in TV Shows, Stage shows and private parties. I have designed and run schools workshops on everything from Hamlet to Circus Skills
I also specialise in Teaching Judo to under 18’s both as a participation coach and a performance style coach. .....so I understand the Modern Child.
I have been to a number of workshops saying they are about Judo Games, there are a number of DVD’s on Judo Games but they are essentially drills and exercises to teach specific skills. Now these are needed and when used well, appropriate - BUT THEY ARE NOT GAMES!
Several DVD’s show adults in workshops loving an exercise but these are workshop games they are not effective regularly – nor are they the sort of things kids request.
Bulldog, Murder Ball, Tag/Tic they are games, things that a child may request to play. So what is a game and how can they be used by a coach?
I use a simple approach to defining a game. They have three conditions
1. A Goal
2. Rules
3. Challenge or task – be this mental physical etc.
Lieberman 2007 defined it as it up as follows:
A rule-based activity involving challenge to reach a goal
In my opinion a Judo Game must meet the following conditions to be practical in a range of classes
1. A game has an objective
2. Has a time scale or restrictive conditions
3. A Challenge or task
4. Defined rules
5. IS FUN
6. If repeated immediately may have a different outcome
7. Age appropriate
Tomorrow I will give you an example or two of games I use and how I adapt them to suit my classes then I will copare then to skill drills
Marc
In my opinion a Judo Game must meet the following conditions to be practical in a range of classes
1. A game has an objective
2. Has a time scale or restrictive conditions
3. A Challenge or task
4. Defined rules
5. IS FUN
6. If repeated immediately may have a different outcome
7. Age appropriate
Tomorrow I will give you an example or two of games I use and how I adapt them to suit my classes then I will copare then to skill drills
Marc
Sunday, 1 February 2009
Welcome
Welcome to my blog...
So here I am and I hope that you enjoy.....
Marc
It's about Judo and me and my love of this great sport and martial art.
As this Blog progresses you will get the a selection of thoughts, rants and ravings on everything form rules changes to coaching to the day to day graft of running a club.
So here go I am 40 and have been doing Judo for 37 years. I did my first BJA grading in 1972! I am now a 2nd Dan and a professional coach.
I teach at Winchester College, The Army Training Regiment in Winchester, a couple of local primary school and at Gosport Judo Club. As such I suffer from the affliction of many coaches, a lot of mat time teaching and not enough training and working my my own Judo.
My Judo is developing and with the help of a couple of mentors I revisiting my entire Judo style, trying a much more upright relaxed stance. I will post videos and pictures and this blog progresses.
I am self financing a FdSC Sports Performance degree at Bath University in Judo, I am currently starting my second year, and hope that this blog can also be used as a place of reflection for my own coaching and development.
So I teach Judo, I fight at Masters level and I study Judo but I have a life out of Judo and that may be touch on but only as it reflects on my Judo.
I am a regular poster on the BJA forum and I intend to expand on some of my comment there in this Blog.
So here I am and I hope that you enjoy.....
Marc
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)